What My Clients Have To Say:

"Unfortunately, my 4th of July weekend ended with a DUI. During my initial consultation with Brad, I felt extremely confident in his ability to fully protect my interests. I am very happy with my decision to hire him. He kept me well informed during the whole process, and was diligent in his practice. Thanks to Brad’s courtroom assertiveness and proactive approach to my case, our motion to suppress all evidence resulted in a DUI dismissal. I appreciate his service, and highly recommend him to others with similar circumstances. "
—From a Maine Client

"After I was arrested for DUI with a BAC of 0.23, I felt a lot of guilt, shame, and remorse. I was also about to get a lifelong record that would cost a lot now and seriously disrupt my work and my future. I decided taking personal responsibility for this didn't mean letting the State decide my future, and so I searched for the best lawyer I could find who specialized in DUI's in Vermont, who would fight for me and who I could trust with the whole truth and with my families future. Choosing Bradley Myerson was one of the best decisions of my life. He examined every inch of my case for legal possibilities, challenged in court and won a suppression of the breath evidence, and then he negotiated a much reduced penalty that I can manage and live with. I feel that my family was given a second chance, thanks to Bradley Myerson."
—From a Lebanon, New Hampshire Client

"After a family wedding celebration I was arrested for a DUI. We hired Bradley Myerson who immediately went to work… and quickly developed a brilliant defense strategy that… was extremely well thought out, and backed up with numerous successful case histories. (on) The day of the Hearing… after less than twenty minutes the Judge ruled in our favor, the case was closed! This verdict spared me and my family from an embarrassing and expensive experience… I would highly recommend retaining Bradley Myerson for your defense attorney."
—From a Rhode Island Client

View All Testimonials

Recent Case Results:

Secured a Judgment Suppressing All Evidence and Judgment In Favor Of The Operator on the Civil Suspension (refusal) proceeding, on grounds that the arresting officers acted unlawfully in ordering the client to exit his vehicle with his hands up and later frisked him, thereby saving the client from a 6 month suspension for refusing the breath test, on grounds that the trial judge agreed that the officers’ actions constituted a “de facto” arrest without probable cause.
October 2011

Secured a Judgment in Favor of the Operator on the Civil Suspension proceeding, reduction of the underlying DUI charge to Negligent Operation, and Dismissal of Negligent Operation and False Information to a Police Officer charges, where the blood test result was 0.189%, on grounds that the arresting officer lacked authority to process the client for DUI outside of his own town, the arresting officer threatened the client with jail unless he provided a blood sample, and that a breath test and not blood sample should have been requested.
October 2011

Secured a Judgment in Favor of the Operator on the Civil Suspension proceeding, and Suppression of all evidence including the breath test results of 0.182% after the stop of the Defendant’s vehicle, on grounds that the arresting officer lacked a reasonable suspicion that the client was under the influence of alcohol.
September 2011

Secured a Suppression of the Breath Test, resulting in a reduced charge of Negligent Operation and dismissal of the Civil Suspension, where the breath test results were 0.233% and 0.219%, on grounds that the arresting officer failed to honor the client’s request for an independent blood sample.
August 2010

Secured a Judgment in Favor of the Operator on the Civil Suspension Proceeding, and secured a Reduced Charge of Negligent Operation, after testimony by the defense chemist convinced the Court that the client’s true blood alcohol level was below 0.08% at the time she was stopped.
January 2010

Secured a Judgment in favor of the operator on the Civil Suspension proceeding, and a reduced charge of Negligent Operation (30 day license suspension), where the client had originally been charged with DWI 2nd Offense (18 month license suspension), after arguing that the client’s release at the scene by one police officer meant that a (2nd) senior officer lacked authority to detain the client and order his arrest.

Secured a Judgment in favor of the operator on the Civil Suspension proceeding, and a reduced charge of Negligent Operation, saving an out of state client from a one year license suspension, after arguing that the arresting officer interfered with the client’s right to a second breath test;

Secured a Suppression of the Breath Test Results and Exclusion of the Results from the Civil Suspension, where the breath test results were 0.233% and 0.219%, on grounds that the arresting officer failed to honor the client’s request for an independent blood sample;

Secured a Judgment in Favor of the Operator on the Civil Suspension Proceeding, and secured a Reduced Charge of Negligent Operation, after testimony by the defense chemist convinced the Court that the client’s true blood alcohol level was below 0.08% at the time she was stopped;

Secured a dismissal of the Civil Suspension and reduction of the DUI to negligent operation (30 day suspension) in a DUI 4th offense case, where the client was facing a lifetime revocation of his license, on grounds that the arresting officer failed to advise the client of his right to speak to an attorney before taking the breath test, even though he had earlier told the client that he had the right to speak to an attorney before answering questions;

Secured a dismissal of the Civil Suspension and reduction of the DUI to negligent operation (30 day suspension) in a DUI 4th offense case, where the client was facing a lifetime revocation of his license, on grounds that the arresting officer failed to advise the client of his right to speak to an attorney before taking the breath test, even though he had earlier told the client that he had the right to speak to an attorney before answering questions;

Secured a reduced charge of misdemeanor Grossly Negligent Operation, where the client had originally been charged with Grossly Negligent Operation, Fatality Resulting, a felony punishable up to 15 years in prison, based upon a fatal head on collision in the breakdown lane of the opposite (wrong) lane of travel. The State consented to the reduced misdemeanor charge after deposition of the State Police Accident Reconstruction Expert and the filing of a Daubert Motion to exclude his testimony regarding vehicle speed;
2009

View All Recent Case Results